Economic and Environmental Effects of Unilateral and Global Climate Policies: From Theory to Realistic Assessment

Ref. 10682

Allgemeine Beschreibung

Periode

1990-2500

Geographischer Raum

-

Zusätzliche geographische Informationen

Switzerland vs. Industrialized World vs. Global World

Kurzbeschreibung

Environmental and Economic effects of (current, unilateral) climate policy is examined in light of (i) the apparent exhaustibility of fossil fuels and (ii) the possibility of future technological and political climate relevant developments. Theoretical economic research tends to neglect these points or to address them in more implicit ways. Dynamic general equilibrium models explicitly allowing for points (i) and (ii) are developed. Using realistic model parameterizations, medium- and long-term projections are made, based on different scenarios notably with respect to (ii), i.e. the prospects for future technological and political climate relevant developments (such as the introduction of backstop technologies, e.g., renewable energies, or stringent global policies). Key questions are to which extent unilateral climate policies achieve the aim of global emission reductions in the medium and long run, whether climate policies may indeed sometimes be counterproductive (Green Paradox), and whether specific policy structures, such as fuel-specific carbon pricing or border tax adjustments may be economically relevant and politically feasible tools for effective and efficient climate policy.

Resultate

The project has so far revealed that the net effects of (unilateral, current) climate policies is strongly dependent on (a) future developments in terms of climate protecting policies or technologies, on the (b) time-discounting of emissions occurring during the next centuries, and on the (c) exhaustibility of fossil fuels. This relativizes the results of the many studies which neglect all or some of the points (a) through (c). It seems clear that these points are subject to large uncertainty (notably future developments and evtl. exhaustibility) and/or controversy (notably discount rate for future emissions). Nevertheless, as they are the primary determinants of current climate policies effects on the relevant medium- or long-term greenhouse gas emissions, it seems undesirable to neglect to account for them, or to address them only implicitly. Instead, scenarios should be used to gather an understanding of the mechanisms through which points (a) through (c) influence the policies effects and to grasp the large uncertainties involved.