Transnational networks, transnational entrepreneurship and role of the state: The Cases of Serbia and Albania

Ref. 13776

Methods

Method description

Three methods were used in this study: 1) analysis of documents, laws and literature in order to determine the theoretical framework of the research, the research results, and the institutional frameworks for transnational business in Serbia and Albania; 2) semi‐structured interviews with 15 transnational entrepreneurs from Serbia and 15 from Albania in order to get to know the characteristics of transnational entrepreneurs and their companies, the ways in which they develop transnational business and the resources that help them in this, as well as the opportunities and obstacles for their business in Serbia/ Albania and 3) electronic survey with 47 transnational entrepreneurs from Serbia and 23 from Albania in order to further highlight the characteristics of transnational entrepreneurs and enterprises, network characteristics important for the initiation and maintenance of transnational business and comparative business conditions in Serbia and abroad. In case of Albania (in total 38 respondents) 32 respondents live in Albania, 5 abroad (Italy, Bucharest, Rome, Milan, Istanbul) while one respondent didn’t answer. The info regarding living residence of Albanian respondents is not divided between those who participated in survey and those who were interviewed, so therefore info is presented here.

Method (instruments)

Population, unit of observation

Development and migration policies, laws, legal framework for entrepreneurship in Serbia and Albania

Participant selection or sampling method (census, random sampling, other sampling method (specify))

No sampling or purposive sampling (CLARIFICATION FORM PI)

Other significant comments

-

Population, unit of observation

Transnational entrepreneurs: citizens of Serbia/Albania who have studied or worked abroad for more than a year and then came back and founded a company in Serbia/Albania or expanded the business they started abroad, and the success of their business depends on regular cooperation with foreign countries. Focus was on a particular type of transnational migrant entrepreneurs who are actually return migrant entrepreneurs.

Participant selection or sampling method (census, random sampling, other sampling method (specify))

Entrepreneurs were reached through professional and private networks, but they were all initial informants.

Other significant comments

Interviews were semi­structured and conducted in person with 15 entrepreneurs from Serbia (12 living in Serbia and 3 living between countries – Serbia/Slovenia/Germany, Serbia­/Hungary, USA­/Serbia). Interviews were conducted in Serbian and Albanian and later translated into English. They were used for the web survey creation.

Population, unit of observation

A wider definition of transnational entrepreneurs was applied: In addition to citizens of Serbia/Albania who studied or worked abroad for more than a year and then returned and established a company in Serbia/Albania, we included those who were still abroad, but operated with Serbia/Albania, as well as employees in transnational companies.

Participant selection or sampling method (census, random sampling, other sampling method (specify))

Entrepreneurs were reached through professional and private networks. The snowball method was used to reach respondents through their networks. In Serbia (Albania), the sample included 15 business owners in Serbia (3 business owners in Albania), 10 business owners abroad (1 business owner abroad), 14 employees in transnational companies in Serbia (16 employees in transnational companies in Albania) and eight employees in transnational companies abroad (3 employees in trans companies abroad).

Other significant comments

Survey was self-completed web survey conducted with 47 respondents from Serbia (28 live in Serbia and 19 still abroad – UK, Australia, India, USA, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Cyprus, France, Norway, Hungary) and 23 from Albania. The questionnaire consisted from 35 mostly closed question, with “other as offered answer and the possibility to explain what “other” is.